Dmitry Kulachenkov
Dmitry Kulachenkov, born 1992, Moscow. Charges: Article 205.2 part 2, Russian Criminal Code (Public incitement to terrorism or justification of terrorism (using media or the internet)); “Dmitry Kulachenkov's case of calls for terrorism”. Status: location unknown.
In brief
Moscow · Moscow · Terrorism cases
Sentence
No information about a verdict.
Charges
- Article 205.2 part 2, Russian Criminal Code — Public incitement to terrorism or justification of terrorism (using media or the internet)
Full wording of the charges
According to the investigation, he wrote a message in a telegram chat room of the Legion's supporters, in which he wrote: "Legion of Freedom of Russia, I wish you would come and shoot these fucking law enforcers who only know how to beat civilians with truncheons".
Latest event
November 8, 2024 — added to the rosfinmonitoring list of “terrorists and extremists”
Timeline
· Added to the Rosfinmonitoring list of “terrorists and extremists”
· Imprisonment ends
· Persecution begins
Dmitry Kulachenkov's case of calls for terrorism
Criminal case
Dmitry Kulachenkov's case of calls for terrorism
Details and sources
Full summary
Resident of Moscow. On 17 March 2024, he was detained in a shop, accused of disorderly conduct, and the next day he was arrested for 15 days. On his way out of the special detention centre, on 1 April, he was detained again and drew up a report on the demonstration of extremist symbols because of a comment about the fighting in Moscow in the telegram chat room "Freedom of Russia Movement". Since he was replying to an administrator's post, the reply automatically included an image with the symbols of the Freedom of Russia Legion from the original post. On 16 May 2024, Kulachenkov was detained again, already as part of a criminal case on calls to terrorism, also because of a comment that looked like an appeal to the Legion.
All fields of the record
- Citizenship
- Russia
Other people prosecuted under Article 205.2 part 2, Russian Criminal Code
Under the same article, not necessarily in the same case.